Financial and statutory audits, internal controls and IFC/ICFR testing, forensic investigation, and the full range of assurance work in between, delivered under one quality framework across India, the USA, the UK, Australia and the UAE.
Not a list of audit types you can get anywhere else, but one defined quality system applied across all of it, whether the engagement is a statutory audit in Mumbai, an IFC review in Dubai, or a fraud investigation in London.
Independent examination of financial statements against the framework and legal requirement in your jurisdiction, mandatory or voluntary.
Design and operating effectiveness of financial controls, plus ITGC review across ERP and financial systems.
Evidence-based investigation of suspected fraud or irregularity, built to hold up before regulators, courts, or parties to a dispute.
GST and VAT audits, tax audit compliance, and the country-specific obligations of tax authorities and revenue departments.
A target's financial history and compliance record, examined on behalf of an investor or acquirer.
Lower levels of assurance for organisations that do not need, or are not yet ready for, a full audit opinion.
Bank branch and concurrent audits, stock audits, trust account audits, and grant or fund compliance audits.
Independent assurance over non-financial disclosures, built alongside our core practice as client demand grows.
What counts as mandatory, what a regulator expects, and who is allowed to sign differs by country. We work to each one's actual requirements.
Statutory audit under the Companies Act 2013, tax audit under the Income Tax Act, GST audit, and IFC reporting, by ICAI-registered professionals.
Financial statement audits under US GAAP, PCAOB standards for public company work, SOX 404 control testing, and litigation-grade forensic accounting.
Statutory audit under the Companies Act 2006, to International Standards on Auditing (UK) under FRC oversight, alongside charity and voluntary assurance.
Financial report audits under the Corporations Act to ASIC thresholds, applying Australian standards, plus internal audit and fraud control work.
Statutory audit under the Commercial Companies Law, free zone licence renewal audits (DMCC, DIFC, JAFZA, ADGM and others), with VAT and corporate tax support.
Local rules differ. The standard behind the work does not. Groups spanning these markets get one framework, coordinated centrally.
An audit opinion is only as good as the system that produced it. Anyone can promise independence and rigour. What determines whether a signature can be trusted is the process standing behind it: who reviewed the work, what technology tested it, and how the firm decided to take the engagement at all.
Assessed before we take the mandate, not after starting the work. If a conflict exists, or we are not the right firm for the risk profile, we say so upfront.
A single core methodology on every engagement, with each jurisdiction's requirements layered on top. A cross-border group gets one consistent standard, coordinated centrally.
The same people who build automation for clients turn it inward: mechanical work cleared fast, analytics directing effort to where risk sits, anomalies flagged for the auditor to evaluate.
Standards change constantly across five jurisdictions. A structured training and update cycle keeps ISA, US GAAP and PCAOB, Ind AS, IFRS and AASB currency built in, not left to individual initiative.
The nature, timing and extent of audit procedures, including how much of a population gets tested, is always a matter of the auditor's professional judgement under the applicable auditing standards. Technology accelerates the mechanical work and sharpens where we look. It does not make that call.
Independence, conflicts, and whether the risk profile is one we are positioned to serve well, assessed before we agree to take the engagement.
We learn your business, map where misstatement, control failure or fraud risk is most likely, and agree the scope before fieldwork begins.
Records, controls or specific transactions tested, technology-enabled and data-driven wherever the engagement allows, with the auditor's judgement setting the nature, timing and extent of the work.
An audit opinion, a controls assessment, or forensic findings, written to be understood by the people who have to act on them.
Where we find a weakness, we help fix it.
An assurance engagement should leave your business stronger than it found it.
Assurance and forensic work carry a different confidentiality risk than most engagements: independence has to be actively protected, and in forensic cases the allegation itself is often more sensitive than the eventual finding.
How evidence is collected, handled and stored matters as much as what it shows. A broken chain of custody can undermine a sound finding.
An allegation under investigation is treated as strictly confidential until findings are established, so reputations are not put at risk by a suspicion that turns out to be unfounded.
Acceptance and continuance decisions screen for conflicts of interest, so the relationships that might compromise objectivity never enter into how we test or report.
With access restricted to the engagement team and those with a legitimate right to review.
On every engagement, before any financial data or evidence is shared.
It depends on your jurisdiction, entity type, size and structure. Tell us where you operate and we will tell you plainly whether an audit is mandatory or voluntary for you.
A statutory audit is an independent, often legally required examination of your financial statements. An internal audit reviews your own processes and controls, usually not mandatory, aimed at improving how the business runs.
We assess independence and risk before accepting a mandate. If there is a conflict, or the engagement is not a good fit for what we can do well, we say so before starting rather than after.
Yes. One methodology, coordinated centrally, with local regulatory requirements layered in per jurisdiction.
Yes. Every engagement is covered by an NDA, and in forensic work specifically, nothing is disclosed until findings are confirmed.
Whether it is a statutory requirement, a lender's request, a board's concern, or a specific suspicion that needs investigating, let's talk about what level of assurance your business actually needs, and the framework standing behind it.